Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 05:04:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Are there known issues with the implementation of NPTL that might give
> > rise to this behaviour? What can we do to help understand and debug
> > it?
> 
> there's nothing special about NPTL, scheduling-wise. But if SCHED_FIFO
> is not properly set for all JACK threads that could explain the
> symptoms. You talked about kludges that are necessary to make all
> threads SCHED_FIFO - are you 100% sure that all JACK threads are indeed
> SCHED_FIFO after these kludges are applied? If yes and you are running a
> later kernel then it's something new and probably NPTL-unrelated.

One thing to note is that NPTL defaults to PTHREAD_INHERIT_SCHED
while LinuxThreads defaults to PTHREAD_EXPLICIT_SCHED.
So, if you care about what scheduling created threads will have
and want it to work with both NPTL and LinuxThreads, you want
pthread_attr_setinheritsched (&attr, PTHREAD_*_SCHED);
explicitely.

	Jakub