Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK

Matt Mackall
2004-07-01T18:04:33Z

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> Because of the recognition by kernel developers that 2.6 does not
> perform as well as 2.4+lowlat (the Andrew Morton patches) when it
> comes to scheduling latency, most audio developers and users have
> remained with 2.4. Recently however, several brave souls have
> attempted to test 2.6. The results have been mixed.

I'm afraid these "brave souls" have shown up to the baby shower after
the child's been accepted to college. Developers getting around to
testing 2.6 after multiple vendors are shipping it should not be
characterized as courageous.

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.