From: Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1/1: Device-Mapper: Remove 1024 devices limitation
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:54:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407012154.16312.kevcorry@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040701143857.256959e5.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thursday 01 July 2004 16:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Remove the limitation of 1024 DM devices.
>
> That seems to be an awful lot of fuss just to maintain a bitmap.
Mmm...perhaps.
> What is a realistic useful upper bound on the minors? Would it not be
> sufficient to increase the size of the statically allocated bitmap?
I guess that depends on who you ask. Obviously, for most people the previous
limit of 1024 devices is more than enough. But there's always going to be
folks pushing the limits. So I figured I'd go ahead and rewrite it to
theoretically allow for the maximum range of minor numbers, while trying not
to waste memory for the common case.
> Did you consider going to a different data structure altogether?
> lib/radix-tree.c and lib/idr.c provide appropriate ones.
The idr stuff looks promising at first glance. I'll take a better look at it
tomorrow and see if we can switch from a bit-set to one of these data
structures.
--
Kevin Corry
kevcorry@us.ibm.com
http://evms.sourceforge.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-02 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 15:35 [PATCH] 1/1: Device-Mapper: Remove 1024 devices limitation Kevin Corry
2004-07-01 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-02 2:54 ` Kevin Corry [this message]
2004-07-02 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-02 17:33 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-02 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 18:23 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-06 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 21:35 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-07-06 22:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-07-06 22:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 22:07 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-06 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 23:00 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-06 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-07 10:58 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-07 11:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-12 14:49 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-12 18:14 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407012154.16312.kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
--to=kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox