Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK

William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-01T18:14:23Z

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>> Because of the recognition by kernel developers that 2.6 does not
>> perform as well as 2.4+lowlat (the Andrew Morton patches) when it
>> comes to scheduling latency, most audio developers and users have
>> remained with 2.4. Recently however, several brave souls have
>> attempted to test 2.6. The results have been mixed.

On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:03:56PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> I'm afraid these "brave souls" have shown up to the baby shower after
> the child's been accepted to college. Developers getting around to
> testing 2.6 after multiple vendors are shipping it should not be
> characterized as courageous.

I appear to have nuked the thread you're replying to in disgust over
this precise issue.

-- wli