From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/2.4.26] Avoid kernel data corruption through /dev/kmem
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:18:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040702131844.GC7679@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407011605.29386.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:05:29PM +0200, BlaisorBlade wrote:
> I'm sending this fix for /dev/kmem; I already sent a cleanup about this, but
> since you said "cleanups go in 2.6", then I'm sending only the bugfix.
Hi Paolo,
This looks much better for inclusion. But do you actually have a problem with
write to /dev/kmem not returning correct error code?
If you convince me there are good enough reasons we can try this on 2.4.28-pre.
Thanks
> We need to check if do_write_mem == -EFAULT.
> In fact, without that check, we could execute this:
>
> do_write_mem returns -EFAULT;
> wrote = -EFAULT;
>
> buf += wrote; //i.e. buf -= EFAULT (14);
>
> ... read other data from buf, and write it to kernel memory
> (actually on special circumstances, i.e. p < high_memory &&
> p + count > high_memory).
>
> Luckily not at all exploitable (not even in the OpenBSD idea) since
> to write on /dev/kmem you must already be root.
>
> ---
>
> linux-2.4.26-paolo/drivers/char/mem.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN drivers/char/mem.c~fix-mem-return drivers/char/mem.c
> --- linux-2.4.26/drivers/char/mem.c~fix-mem-return 2004-07-01 15:14:00.275806312 +0200
> +++ linux-2.4.26-paolo/drivers/char/mem.c 2004-07-01 15:28:24.604408392 +0200
> @@ -287,11 +287,13 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file *
> char * kbuf; /* k-addr because vwrite() takes vmlist_lock rwlock */
>
> if (p < (unsigned long) high_memory) {
> - wrote = count;
> + ssize_t towrite = count;
> if (count > (unsigned long) high_memory - p)
> - wrote = (unsigned long) high_memory - p;
> + towrite = (unsigned long) high_memory - p;
>
> - wrote = do_write_mem(file, (void*)p, p, buf, wrote, ppos);
> + wrote = do_write_mem(file, (void*)p, p, buf, towrite, ppos);
> + if (wrote != towrite)
> + return wrote;
>
> p += wrote;
> buf += wrote;
> _
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-02 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 14:05 [PATCH/2.4.26] Avoid kernel data corruption through /dev/kmem BlaisorBlade
2004-07-02 13:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2004-07-03 18:13 ` BlaisorBlade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040702131844.GC7679@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox