From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264902AbUGBTVU (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:21:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264890AbUGBTVU (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:21:20 -0400 Received: from gprs214-65.eurotel.cz ([160.218.214.65]:22669 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264902AbUGBTUT (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:20:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:20:04 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide-taskfile.c fixups/cleanups part #2 [1/9] Message-ID: <20040702192003.GA10138@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200406301724.05862.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <20040702122004.GC12889@elf.ucw.cz> <200407021843.08976.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407021843.08976.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > diff -puN drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c~ide_tf_pio_out_fixes > > > drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c --- > > > linux-2.6.7-bk11/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c~ide_tf_pio_out_fixes 2004-06- > > >28 21:15:54.030210376 +0200 +++ > > > linux-2.6.7-bk11-bzolnier/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c 2004-06-28 > > > 21:15:54.035209616 +0200 @@ -409,6 +409,10 @@ ide_startstop_t > > > task_out_intr (ide_drive > > > if (!OK_STAT(stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG), DRIVE_READY, > > > drive->bad_wstat)) { return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "task_out_intr", > > > stat); > > > } > > > + > > > + if (((stat & DRQ_STAT) == 0) ^ !rq->current_nr_sectors) > > > + return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, __FUNCTION__, stat); > > > + > > > > Looks pretty close to obfuscated c code contents... Can't you use != > > wrrr... > > > or kill ! in second clause and use == or something? > > Pavel > > is > > if (((stat & DRQ_STAT) != 0) ^ (rq->current_nr_sectors != 0)) > > better? Not much... maybe its just me but I find bitwise xor hard to read in logical expression. Perhaps if (!(stat & DRQ_STAT) != !rq->current_nr_sectors) ? Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!