From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265261AbUGCVXj (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jul 2004 17:23:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265266AbUGCVXj (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jul 2004 17:23:39 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:57758 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265261AbUGCVXi (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jul 2004 17:23:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 18:04:27 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: "Marcelo W. Tosatti" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] building linux-2.4 with gcc 3.3.3 Message-ID: <20040703210427.GC13076@logos.cnet> References: <20040629153452.5a03ab5e@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040629153452.5a03ab5e@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:34:52PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > It appears linux-2.4 won't build with gcc 3.3.3 (SuSe) because it is picky about > the attributes matching the prototype which shows up on the FASTCALL() usage. Right, I think its OK to incorporate Mikael's gcc-3.4.0 fixes in 2.4.28-pre1, which already include the fastcall fixes: http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/patches/2.4/patch-gcc340-fixes-2.4.27-rc2 I had a couple of doubts about it and asked Mikael privately, but no big deal.