From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264414AbUGFUbk (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:31:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264492AbUGFUbe (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:31:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:30646 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264414AbUGFUbQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:31:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:28:22 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: jamie@shareable.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix tcp_default_win_scale. Message-Id: <20040706132822.70c8174a.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040706130549.31daa8e0@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> References: <32886.63.170.215.71.1088564087.squirrel@www.osdl.org> <20040629222751.392f0a82.davem@redhat.com> <20040630152750.2d01ca51@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040630153049.3ca25b76.davem@redhat.com> <20040701133738.301b9e46@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040701140406.62dfbc2a.davem@redhat.com> <20040702013225.GA24707@conectiva.com.br> <20040706093503.GA8147@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20040706114741.1bf98bbe@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040706194034.GA11021@mail.shareable.org> <20040706130549.31daa8e0@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:05:49 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:40:34 +0100 > Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > Are you saying there are broken firewalls which strip TCP options in > > one direction only? > > It appears so. Ok, this is a possibility. And why it breaks is that if the ACK for the SYN+ACK comes back, the SYN+ACK sender can only assume that the window scale was accepted. Stephen, do you have a trace showing exactly this?