From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265283AbUGGSWy (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:22:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265282AbUGGSVp (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:21:45 -0400 Received: from linuxhacker.ru ([217.76.32.60]:5075 "EHLO shrek.linuxhacker.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265281AbUGGSUk (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:20:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 21:20:24 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: John Richard Moser Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, braam@clusterfs.com Subject: Re: [0/9] Lustre VFS patches for 2.6 Message-ID: <20040707182024.GK5619@linuxhacker.ru> References: <20040707124732.GA25877@clusterfs.com> <40EC19C6.9010309@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40EC19C6.9010309@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:41:58AM -0400, John Richard Moser wrote: > Interesting, but what exactly does this do? Extra performance? How? > Extra security? Avoid deadlocks? These are just kernel bits necessary for Lustre to work. Without lustre there should be no noticeable difference. Lustre is a cluster filesystem and you can get more info about it at http://www.lustre.org Bye, Oleg