From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265889AbUGHHQB (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 03:16:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265884AbUGHHMW (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 03:12:22 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:24285 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265883AbUGHHLf (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 03:11:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:10:27 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Con Kolivas Cc: nigelenki@comcast.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Autoregulate swappiness & inactivation Message-Id: <20040708001027.7fed0bc4.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <40EC13C5.2000101@kolivas.org> <40EC1930.7010805@comcast.net> <40EC1B0A.8090802@kolivas.org> <20040707213822.2682790b.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: > > Ah what the heck. They can only be knocked back to where they already are. hm. You get an eGrump for sending two patchs in one email. Surprisingly nice numbers though. How come vm_swappiness gets squared? That's the mysterious "bias downwards", yes? What's the theory there? Please define this new term "application pages"? Those si_swapinfo() and si_meminfo() calls need to come out of there. A diff against Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt will be needed sometime, please.