From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264639AbUGHUvR (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:51:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265007AbUGHUvR (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:51:17 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:20168 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264639AbUGHUvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:51:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 22:32:01 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] New set of input patches Message-ID: <20040708203200.GA607@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <200407080155.07827.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407080155.07827.dtor_core@ameritech.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > 03-i8042-broken-mux-workaround.patch > - Some MUXes get confused what AUX port the byte came from. Assume > that is came from the same port previous byte came from if it > arrived within HZ/10 Does that mean that (even if my hw is ok) when I two mice at once I get random movements? -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms