From: "Paweł Sikora" <pluto@ds14.agh.edu.pl>
To: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining.
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:23:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407091223.47516.pluto@ds14.agh.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407091143.41955.mbuesch@freenet.de>
On Friday 09 of July 2004 11:43, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Quoting Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>:
> > It's too bad that i386 doesn't enable -funit-at-a-time, that improves
> > the inlining heuristics greatly.
>
> From the gcc manpage:
>
> -O2 turns on all optimization flags specified by -O. It
> also turns on the following optimization flags: -fforce-mem
> -foptimize-sibling-calls -fstrength-reduce -fcse-follow-jumps
> -fcse-skip-blocks -frerun-cse-after-loop -frerun-loop-opt
> -fgcse -fgcse-lm -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fdelete-null-pointer-checks
> -fexpensive-optimizations -fregmove -fschedule-insns
> -fschedule-insns2 -fsched-interblock -fsched-spec -fcaller-saves
> -fpeephole2 -freorder-blocks -freorder-functions -fstrict-aliasing
> -funit-at-a-time -falign-functions -falign-jumps -falign-loops
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> -falign-labels -fcrossjumping
>
> Do I miss something?
# gcc-3.4.1/gcc/opts.c
if (optimize >= 2)
{
(...)
flag_unit_at_a_time = 1;
}
btw).
I *don't trust* manpages ;)
# man gcc
-fomit-frame-pointer
Don't keep the frame pointer in a register for functions that don't
need one. This avoids the instructions to save, set up and restore
frame pointers; it also makes an extra register available in many
functions. It also makes debugging impossible on some machines.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(...)
Enabled at levels -O, -O2, -O3, -Os.
^^^^^^^
if (optimize >= 1)
{
(...)
#ifdef CAN_DEBUG_WITHOUT_FP
flag_omit_frame_pointer = 1;
#endif
(...)
finally, at ix86 -O[123s] doesn't turn on -fomit-frame-pointer.
manpage tells somethine else...
--
/* Copyright (C) 2003, SCO, Inc. This is valuable Intellectual Property. */
#define say(x) lie(x)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2fFzK-3Zz-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2fG2F-4qK-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2fG2G-4qK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2fPfF-2Dv-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2fPfF-2Dv-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-09 4:51 ` GCC 3.4 and broken inlining Andi Kleen
2004-07-09 4:56 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-09 5:46 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-09 9:43 ` Michael Buesch
2004-07-09 10:23 ` Paweł Sikora [this message]
2004-07-10 21:33 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-11 5:52 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-14 3:00 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-09 18:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-09 21:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-09 22:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-10 4:50 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-10 21:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-11 5:53 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-11 6:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-11 8:26 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-11 8:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-11 9:08 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-11 11:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-11 13:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-07-13 1:02 ` [updated 2.6 patch] #define inline as __attribute__((always_inline)) also for gcc >= 3.4 Adrian Bunk
[not found] <fa.hnj36kg.4no2jk@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.gktbdsg.1n4em8o@ifi.uio.no>
2004-07-10 3:12 ` GCC 3.4 and broken inlining Robert Hancock
[not found] <2fVEt-6Vy-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2fVO5-79H-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2fWqQ-7uv-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2g0b6-1Cf-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-09 10:04 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-08 11:46 Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-08 12:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-07-08 12:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
[not found] ` <200407090036.39323.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-07-08 22:00 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-08 22:41 ` Zan Lynx
2004-07-09 6:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-10 21:20 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-08 20:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-08 21:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-08 22:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-08 22:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-08 22:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-09 6:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-10 1:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-10 2:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-13 22:19 ` Timothy Miller
2004-07-10 6:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-10 21:17 ` Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407091223.47516.pluto@ds14.agh.edu.pl \
--to=pluto@ds14.agh.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox