From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264973AbUGIP43 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:56:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265007AbUGIP43 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:56:29 -0400 Received: from [193.12.224.70] ([193.12.224.70]:42485 "EHLO defiant") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264973AbUGIP42 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:56:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:56:14 +0200 From: Erik Rigtorp To: Dave Jones , Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp bootsplash support Message-ID: <20040709155614.GA8426@linux.nu> Reply-To: erik@rigtorp.com References: <20040708110549.GB9919@linux.nu> <20040708133934.GA10997@infradead.org> <20040708204840.GB607@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20040708210403.GA18049@infradead.org> <20040708225216.GA27815@elf.ucw.cz> <20040708225501.GA20143@infradead.org> <20040709051528.GB23152@elf.ucw.cz> <20040709115531.GA28343@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040709115531.GA28343@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:55:31PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > Personally I'd prefer the effort went into making suspend actually > work on more machines rather than painting eyecandy for the minority > of machines it currently works on. Miniority? Well both swsusp and pmdisk has worked on the majority of machines I've come across. From what I understand swsusp works on almost all x86 uniprocessor machines and that's a lot of machines. Some drivers are a hassle though. Erik