From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S266177AbUGJHDj@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S266177AbUGJHDj (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 10 Jul 2004 03:03:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266175AbUGJHDj
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 10 Jul 2004 03:03:39 -0400
Received: from S010600104b97db1e.gv.shawcable.net ([24.68.211.67]:62482 "EHLO
	antichrist") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266177AbUGJHDd (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 10 Jul 2004 03:03:33 -0400
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:58:02 -0700
From: carbonated beverage <ramune@net-ronin.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: bk pull from bkbits screwy?
Message-ID: <20040710065802.GA29604@net-ronin.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

I sent a patch a while ago to change the bk:// to http:// in the docs,
but was told bk:// was working again.  Just did a bk pull again right now,
and bk:// doesn't seem to be working, whereas reparenting my repo to http://
and doing a bk pull works.  Am I missing something?

-- DN
Daniel