* bk pull from bkbits screwy?
@ 2004-07-10 6:58 carbonated beverage
2004-07-10 22:15 ` Andy Isaacson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: carbonated beverage @ 2004-07-10 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I sent a patch a while ago to change the bk:// to http:// in the docs,
but was told bk:// was working again. Just did a bk pull again right now,
and bk:// doesn't seem to be working, whereas reparenting my repo to http://
and doing a bk pull works. Am I missing something?
-- DN
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bk pull from bkbits screwy?
2004-07-10 6:58 bk pull from bkbits screwy? carbonated beverage
@ 2004-07-10 22:15 ` Andy Isaacson
2004-07-11 16:05 ` carbonated beverage
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Isaacson @ 2004-07-10 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: carbonated beverage; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:58:02PM -0700, carbonated beverage wrote:
> I sent a patch a while ago to change the bk:// to http:// in the docs,
> but was told bk:// was working again. Just did a bk pull again right now,
> and bk:// doesn't seem to be working, whereas reparenting my repo to http://
> and doing a bk pull works. Am I missing something?
How about giving the command that didn't work, and the error messages it
printed? I just did a pull using bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and it
succeeded:
...
takepatch: 25577 new revisions, 0 conflicts in 6840 files
8439936 bytes uncompressed to 36145013, 4.28X expansion
Running resolve to apply new work ...
Using :0.0 as graphical display
resolve: found 491 renames in pass 1
resolve: resolved 491 renames in pass 2
resolve: applied 6840 files in pass 4
resolve: running consistency check, please wait...
100% |=================================================================| OK
Consistency check passed, resolve complete.
straum% bk pull
Pull bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
-> file://data/linux/linux-2.5
Nothing to pull.
straum%
There are two different URL syntaxes that start "bk://" and perhaps
you're using the wrong one. (I got caught by that one a while back.)
And yes, bk:// is preferred over http://, in general.
-andy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bk pull from bkbits screwy?
2004-07-10 22:15 ` Andy Isaacson
@ 2004-07-11 16:05 ` carbonated beverage
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: carbonated beverage @ 2004-07-11 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Isaacson; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:15:29PM -0500, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> How about giving the command that didn't work, and the error messages it
> printed? I just did a pull using bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and it
> succeeded:
cd linux-2.5 ; bk pull
The command then told me there was nothing to pull.
While I never had a problem with the http:// URL, the bk:// URL seems to
work some days and show nothing pending on other days, even when there are
change sets that are several weeks old in bkbits that aren't in my local
repo.
-- DN
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-11 16:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-10 6:58 bk pull from bkbits screwy? carbonated beverage
2004-07-10 22:15 ` Andy Isaacson
2004-07-11 16:05 ` carbonated beverage
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox