From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: binutils woes
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:32:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040711123217.C13616@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040701175231.B8389@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk on Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:52:31PM +0100
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:52:31PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> I think the only way we can ensure kernel correctness is to add a
> subsequent stage to kbuild such that whenever we generate a final
> program, we grep the 'nm' output for undefined symbols.
...
BTW, binutils 2.15 on ARM has other issues, which I've reported to
Nick Clifton/binutils-bug. The assembler seems to produce extra
symbolic information in the form of symbols starting with '$', eg:
c0067860 T __fput
c0067860 t $a
c0067954 t $d
c0067958 T fget
c0067958 t $a
Not only do these symbols interfere with ld's error reporting, but
they also interfere with kallsyms - the backtrace information from
such a kernel is not very useful when it reports function names of
'$a':
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x6042c): In function `$a':
: relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 .exit.text
Obviously not useful to anyone.
This seems to only affect binutils 2.15, so I think we should hang
fire on any work-arounds until the binutils folk have commented.
--
Russell King
... who dearly wishes that the kernel build was still compatible
with the good old stable binutils 2.11 versions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-11 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 16:52 binutils woes Russell King
2004-07-01 17:47 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-01 18:07 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 19:44 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-07-01 19:52 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 22:12 ` Russell King
2004-07-01 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-01 22:22 ` Russell King
2004-07-02 10:56 ` Michael Buesch
2004-07-11 11:32 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-07-11 13:56 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040711123217.C13616@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox