public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: serious performance regression due to NX patch
Date: 11 Jul 2004 14:43:07 +0200
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:43:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040711124307.GA88881@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407110754280.26194@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:56:10AM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > > +#ifdef __i386__
> > 
> > Won't do on x86-64.
> 
> well on x86-64 'non-executable' really means non-executable, and always
> did, right? (and this is completely separate from the issue of whether the
> process stack is executable or not. This is about x86 that didnt enforce
> the vma's protection bit.)

Not quite - there is 32bit emulation. And the 64bit version also doesn't
do NX by default, but also relies on ELF header bits for this.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-11 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2giKE-67F-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2gIc8-6pd-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <2gJ8a-72b-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <2gJhY-776-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-11 10:09       ` serious performance regression due to NX patch Andi Kleen
2004-07-11 11:56         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 12:43           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
     [not found]       ` <2gJrv-7kp-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <2gLD2-qn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-11 13:38           ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-11 14:04             ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-07-10  5:28 David Mosberger
2004-07-11  8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11  9:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11  9:52     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11 10:02       ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-11 12:19         ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-07-11 10:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-11 12:38       ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-07-12 18:08         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 18:24           ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-12 18:29             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 19:10               ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 19:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-12 20:08                   ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:17           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-12 20:21             ` David Mosberger
2004-07-12 20:24             ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13  4:23               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-13  5:23                 ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13 16:05                 ` Mark Haverkamp
2004-07-13 16:49                   ` Daniel McNeil
2004-07-17  0:06                   ` David Mosberger
2004-07-17  1:39                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-17  4:37                       ` David Mosberger
2004-07-13  3:58             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-17  0:35     ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040711124307.GA88881@muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox