From: Andrey Panin <pazke@donpac.ru>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Moving per-arch IRQ handling code into common directories
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:59:16 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040712045916.GD13803@pazke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040711110919.GI5232@krispykreme>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]
On 193, 07 11, 2004 at 09:09:20PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Inside each arch-specific kernel/irq.c, there's a comment something like,
> > /* (mostly architecture independent, will move to kernel/irq.c in 2.5.) */
> >
> > This obviously hasn't happened, even though there was a patch by
> > Andrey Panin floating about around a year ago. Is there some
> > fundamental objection to consolidating the IRQ handling as far as
> > possible, or was it just that the patch didn't get high enough profile?
>
> I think it died because we were in a freeze at the time. Id like to see
> it happen again, perhaps we can get something together to go into -mm.
No, it almost died because of lack of time to track changes in so many
architectures. BTW can you take a look at attached patch, which removes
do_free_irq() crap from ppc64 irq handling code ?
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
pazke@donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
[-- Attachment #1.2: patch-ppc64-free_irq-cleanup --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2821 bytes --]
diff -urpN -X /usr/share/dontdiff linux-2.6.7.vanilla/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c linux-2.6.7-ppc64/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c
--- linux-2.6.7.vanilla/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c Sat May 22 14:58:15 2004
+++ linux-2.6.7-ppc64/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c Sat May 22 19:58:35 2004
@@ -143,47 +143,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_irq);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-/* XXX Make this into free_irq() - Anton */
-
-/* This could be promoted to a real free_irq() ... */
-static int
-do_free_irq(int irq, void* dev_id)
-{
- irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq);
- struct irqaction **p;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock,flags);
- p = &desc->action;
- for (;;) {
- struct irqaction * action = *p;
- if (action) {
- struct irqaction **pp = p;
- p = &action->next;
- if (action->dev_id != dev_id)
- continue;
-
- /* Found it - now remove it from the list of entries */
- *pp = action->next;
- if (!desc->action) {
- desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
- mask_irq(irq);
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
-
- /* Wait to make sure it's not being used on another CPU */
- synchronize_irq(irq);
- kfree(action);
- return 0;
- }
- printk("Trying to free free IRQ%d\n",irq);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
- break;
- }
- return -ENOENT;
-}
-
-
int request_irq(unsigned int irq,
irqreturn_t (*handler)(int, void *, struct pt_regs *),
unsigned long irqflags, const char * devname, void *dev_id)
@@ -194,8 +153,7 @@ int request_irq(unsigned int irq,
if (irq >= NR_IRQS)
return -EINVAL;
if (!handler)
- /* We could implement really free_irq() instead of that... */
- return do_free_irq(irq, dev_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
action = (struct irqaction *)
kmalloc(sizeof(struct irqaction), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -222,7 +180,38 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_irq);
void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
{
- request_irq(irq, NULL, 0, NULL, dev_id);
+ irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq);
+ struct irqaction **p;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock,flags);
+ p = &desc->action;
+ for (;;) {
+ struct irqaction * action = *p;
+ if (action) {
+ struct irqaction **pp = p;
+ p = &action->next;
+ if (action->dev_id != dev_id)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Found it - now remove it from the list of entries */
+ *pp = action->next;
+ if (!desc->action) {
+ desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
+ mask_irq(irq);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
+
+ /* Wait to make sure it's not being used on another CPU */
+ synchronize_irq(irq);
+ kfree(action);
+ return;
+ }
+ printk("Trying to free free IRQ%d\n",irq);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
+ break;
+ }
+ return;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_irq);
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-12 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-24 0:54 Moving per-arch IRQ handling code into common directories Peter Chubb
2004-07-11 11:09 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-07-12 4:59 ` Andrey Panin [this message]
2004-08-02 15:54 ` Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040712045916.GD13803@pazke \
--to=pazke@donpac.ru \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox