From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim.houston@comcast.net,
dm-devel@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1/1: Device-Mapper: Remove 1024 devices limitation
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:14:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040712111445.374bf579.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407120949.03928.kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 07 July 2004 6:10 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Jim Houston <jim.houston@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > It's not quite right. If you want to keep a count in the upper bits
> > > you have to mask off that count before checking if the id is beyond the
> > > end of the allocated space.
> >
> > OK, I'll fix that up.
> >
> > But I don't want to keep a count in the upper bits! I want rid of that
> > stuff altogether, completely, all of it. It just keeps on hanging around
> > :(
> >
> > We should remove MAX_ID_* from the kernel altogether.
>
> Just following up on the proposed IDR changes. Based on the patches in the
> latest -mm tree, I'm assuming there is or will be a fix for IDR so it will
> always return NULL when asked to find an id that's not currently allocated.
> Is this correct? If so, I can drop the second "dm-use-idr" patch (from July
> 6, 2004) and keep the one that's currently in -mm.
>
Yes, I'm assuming that the code in Linus's tree at present is acceptable,
and I'll take another look at the idr code post-2.6.8.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-12 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 15:35 [PATCH] 1/1: Device-Mapper: Remove 1024 devices limitation Kevin Corry
2004-07-01 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-02 2:54 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-02 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-02 17:33 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-02 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 18:23 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-06 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 21:35 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-07-06 22:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-07-06 22:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 22:07 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-06 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-06 23:00 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-06 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-07 10:58 ` Jim Houston
2004-07-07 11:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-12 14:49 ` Kevin Corry
2004-07-12 18:14 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040712111445.374bf579.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jim.houston@comcast.net \
--cc=kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox