From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264512AbUGMAQB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:16:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264401AbUGMAQA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:16:00 -0400 Received: from muss.CIS.McMaster.CA ([130.113.64.9]:15235 "EHLO cgpsrv1.cis.mcmaster.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264512AbUGMAP2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:15:28 -0400 From: Gabriel Devenyi To: Con Kolivas Subject: Re: Preempt Threshold Measurements Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:15:27 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200407121943.25196.devenyga@mcmaster.ca> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407122015.27971.devenyga@mcmaster.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm using snapshot-2.6.8-rc1-ck5-0407130047 On Monday 12 July 2004 19:59, Con Kolivas wrote: > Gabriel Devenyi writes: > > Keeping in mind that I'm using the nvidia-kernel drivers, here are my > > preempt threshold violations. > > Hi. > > Thanks for those. Can you confirm which version of the preempt threshold > patch you're using? The first one I posted unfortunately had false > positives. Those results unfortunately look like the first patch. > > You would have to be using either wli_preempttest2 + 2.1 separate patches > or the snapshot-2.6.8-rc1-ck5-0407130047 or later which includes these > patches for more accurate timekeeping (sorry). > > Cheers, > Con -- Gabriel Devenyi devenyga@mcmaster.ca