From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267384AbUGNNmt (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:42:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267385AbUGNNmt (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:42:49 -0400 Received: from gprs214-226.eurotel.cz ([160.218.214.226]:52864 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267384AbUGNNml (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:42:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:42:27 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel list Subject: Re: ipw2100 wireless driver Message-ID: <20040714134227.GA8978@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040714114135.GA25175@elf.ucw.cz> <20040714131523.GA498@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040714131523.GA498@ucw.cz> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > What is the status of ipw2100? Is there chance that it would be pushed > > into mainline? > > > > I have few problems with that: > > > > * it will not compile with gcc-2.95. Attached patch fixes one problem > > but more remain. > > Wouldn't "struct sk_buff **fragments" be a more correct fix? Yep, that would certainly be better. I'll wait if I get some reply from ipw2100 people. If so I'll update the patch. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!