Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop

["Paul Rolland" <rol@as2917.net>]

Hello,

Well, we have an option to be able to select EXPERIMENTAL code when
making a configuration, why not adding on option for DEPRECATED code ?

Then, you'd just have to migrate cryptoloop into this DEPRECATED
area.

Kconfig should be able to handle that very easily !

Regards,
Paul

Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net
ex-AS2917 Network administrator and Peering Coordinator

--

Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un navigateur

"Some people dream of success... while others wake up and work hard at it" 

  

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org 
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de James Morris
> Envoyé : jeudi 22 juillet 2004 07:22
> À : dpf-lkml@fountainbay.com
> Cc : Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Objet : Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop
> 
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 dpf-lkml@fountainbay.com wrote:
> 
> > Ditching cryptoloop completely in 2.7 after dm-crypt 
> matures would be a
> > better idea.
> 
> Part of the reason for dropping cryptoloop is to help 
> dm-crypt mature more 
> quickly.
> 
> I've had some off-list email on the security of dm-crypt, and it seems
> that it does need some work.  We need to get the security 
> right more than 
> we need to worry about these other issues.
> 
> Let's drop the technically inferior of the two (cryptoloop) and
> concentrate on fixing the other (dm-crypt).
> 
> There was a thread on redesigning the security a while back (subject:
> "dm-crypt, new IV and standards"), but no code came out of 
> it.  Anyone 
> interested should probably have a look at that.
> 
> 
> - James
> -- 
> James Morris
> <jmorris@redhat.com>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
>