From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267588AbUGWKOl (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:14:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267597AbUGWKOl (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:14:41 -0400 Received: from smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.83]:35240 "HELO smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267588AbUGWKOf (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:14:35 -0400 From: tabris To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [Repost] IDE error 2.6.7-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.8-rc1-mm1 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:14:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200407220659.22948.tabris@tabriel.tabris.net> <20040722153933.GJ3987@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20040722153933.GJ3987@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407230614.30822.tabris@tabris.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 July 2004 11:39 am, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22 2004, Tabris wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Jul 21 03:00:18 tabriel kernel: hda: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { > > DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > > Jul 21 03:00:18 tabriel kernel: hda: drive_cmd: error=0x04 { > > DriveStatusError } > > Jul 21 03:00:18 tabriel kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xe7 > > Jul 21 03:00:23 tabriel kernel: hda: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { > > DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > > Jul 21 03:00:23 tabriel kernel: hda: drive_cmd: error=0x04 { > > DriveStatusError } > > Jul 21 03:00:23 tabriel kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xe7 > > Jul 21 03:00:28 tabriel kernel: hda: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { > > DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > > Jul 21 03:00:28 tabriel kernel: hda: drive_cmd: error=0x04 { > > DriveStatusError } > > Jul 21 03:00:28 tabriel kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xe7 > > > > This error did not occur in 2.6.6-rc3-mm2. Turning off ACPI made > > no difference, not that I expected one. > > > > It appears to be harmless but it's polluting my syslog. > > > > Appears related to > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108946389700930 > > > > None of my harddrives are over 60GiB (and hda is an 8GiB), so > > there's no reason i should be getting LBA48 Flush Cache. > > > > What should I do, what do you need from me to get to the bottom of > > this? > > Does this work? No, however it does seem to start it going in my syslog a bit earlier, but that may be meaningless (normally I found it waited until after qmail would start). Also, my i2c/sensors have stopped working (tho I doubt it has anything to do with your patch, it _does_ lineup with my applying your patch and rebooting...) -- tabris - Is it weird in here, or is it just me? -- Steven Wright