* [patch-kj] use list_for_each() in fs/jffs/intrep.c
@ 2004-07-23 15:55 maximilian attems
2004-07-23 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: maximilian attems @ 2004-07-23 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jffs-dev; +Cc: linux-kernel
Use list_for_each() where applicable
- for (list = ymf_devs.next; list != &ymf_devs; list = list->next) {
+ list_for_each(list, &ymf_devs) {
pure cosmetic change, defined as a preprocessor macro in:
include/linux/list.h
applies cleanly to 2.6.8-rc2
From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
---
linux-2.6.7-bk20-max/fs/jffs/intrep.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/jffs/intrep.c~list_for_each-fs-jffs fs/jffs/intrep.c
--- linux-2.6.7-bk20/fs/jffs/intrep.c~list_for_each-fs-jffs 2004-07-11 14:41:04.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.7-bk20-max/fs/jffs/intrep.c 2004-07-11 14:41:04.000000000 +0200
@@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ jffs_find_file(struct jffs_control *c, _
D3(printk("jffs_find_file(): ino: %u\n", ino));
- for (tmp = c->hash[i].next; tmp != &c->hash[i]; tmp = tmp->next) {
+ list_for_each(tmp, &c->hash[i]) {
f = list_entry(tmp, struct jffs_file, hash);
if (ino != f->ino)
continue;
@@ -2021,11 +2021,10 @@ jffs_foreach_file(struct jffs_control *c
for (pos = 0; pos < c->hash_len; pos++) {
struct list_head *p, *next;
- for (p = c->hash[pos].next; p != &c->hash[pos]; p = next) {
- /* We need a reference to the next file in the
- list because `func' might remove the current
- file `f'. */
- next = p->next;
+
+ /* We must do _safe, because 'func' might remove the
+ current file 'f' from the list. */
+ list_for_each_safe(p, next, &c->hash[pos]) {
r = func(list_entry(p, struct jffs_file, hash));
if (r < 0)
return r;
@@ -2590,7 +2589,7 @@ jffs_print_hash_table(struct jffs_contro
printk("JFFS: Dumping the file system's hash table...\n");
for (i = 0; i < c->hash_len; i++) {
struct list_head *p;
- for (p = c->hash[i].next; p != &c->hash[i]; p = p->next) {
+ list_for_each(p, &c->hash[i]) {
struct jffs_file *f=list_entry(p,struct jffs_file,hash);
printk("*** c->hash[%u]: \"%s\" "
"(ino: %u, pino: %u)\n",
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch-kj] use list_for_each() in fs/jffs/intrep.c
2004-07-23 15:55 [patch-kj] use list_for_each() in fs/jffs/intrep.c maximilian attems
@ 2004-07-23 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-23 19:02 ` Domen Puncer
2004-07-25 12:15 ` maximilian attems
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2004-07-23 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: maximilian attems; +Cc: jffs-dev, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:55:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> Use list_for_each() where applicable
> - for (list = ymf_devs.next; list != &ymf_devs; list = list->next) {
> + list_for_each(list, &ymf_devs) {
> pure cosmetic change, defined as a preprocessor macro in:
> include/linux/list.h
>
> applies cleanly to 2.6.8-rc2
>
> From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Please switch to list_for_each_entry while you're at it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch-kj] use list_for_each() in fs/jffs/intrep.c
2004-07-23 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2004-07-23 19:02 ` Domen Puncer
2004-07-29 11:33 ` Domen Puncer
2004-07-25 12:15 ` maximilian attems
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Domen Puncer @ 2004-07-23 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: jffs-dev
Hi.
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:17:24 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:55:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>>
>> Use list_for_each() where applicable
>> - for (list = ymf_devs.next; list != &ymf_devs; list = list->next) {
>> + list_for_each(list, &ymf_devs) {
>> pure cosmetic change, defined as a preprocessor macro in:
>> include/linux/list.h
>>
>> applies cleanly to 2.6.8-rc2
>>
>> From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
>
> Please switch to list_for_each_entry while you're at it.
Jup, list_for_each_entry is nicer.
(first time posting trough gmane, hope it works)
Compile tested
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
--- c/fs/jffs/intrep.c Wed Jul 14 19:15:11 2004
+++ a/fs/jffs/intrep.c Fri Jul 23 20:08:55 2004
@@ -1619,12 +1619,10 @@
{
struct jffs_file *f;
int i = ino % c->hash_len;
- struct list_head *tmp;
D3(printk("jffs_find_file(): ino: %u\n", ino));
- for (tmp = c->hash[i].next; tmp != &c->hash[i]; tmp = tmp->next) {
- f = list_entry(tmp, struct jffs_file, hash);
+ list_for_each_entry(f, c->hash[i].next, hash) {
if (ino != f->ino)
continue;
D3(printk("jffs_find_file(): Found file with ino "
@@ -2020,13 +2018,12 @@
int result = 0;
for (pos = 0; pos < c->hash_len; pos++) {
- struct list_head *p, *next;
- for (p = c->hash[pos].next; p != &c->hash[pos]; p = next) {
- /* We need a reference to the next file in the
- list because `func' might remove the current
- file `f'. */
- next = p->next;
- r = func(list_entry(p, struct jffs_file, hash));
+ struct jffs_file *f, *next;
+
+ /* We must do _safe, because 'func' might remove the
+ current file 'f' from the list. */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(f, next, &c->hash[pos], hash) {
+ r = func(f);
if (r < 0)
return r;
result += r;
@@ -2589,9 +2586,8 @@
printk("JFFS: Dumping the file system's hash table...\n");
for (i = 0; i < c->hash_len; i++) {
- struct list_head *p;
- for (p = c->hash[i].next; p != &c->hash[i]; p = p->next) {
- struct jffs_file *f=list_entry(p,struct jffs_file,hash);
+ struct jffs_file *f;
+ list_for_each_entry(f, &c->hash[i], hash) {
printk("*** c->hash[%u]: \"%s\" "
"(ino: %u, pino: %u)\n",
i, (f->name ? f->name : ""),
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch-kj] use list_for_each() in fs/jffs/intrep.c
2004-07-23 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-23 19:02 ` Domen Puncer
@ 2004-07-25 12:15 ` maximilian attems
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: maximilian attems @ 2004-07-25 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, jffs-dev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:55:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > Use list_for_each() where applicable
> > - for (list = ymf_devs.next; list != &ymf_devs; list = list->next) {
> > + list_for_each(list, &ymf_devs) {
> > pure cosmetic change, defined as a preprocessor macro in:
> > include/linux/list.h
> >
> > applies cleanly to 2.6.8-rc2
> >
> > From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
>
> Please switch to list_for_each_entry while you're at it.
thx will look through the patches that needs that.
a++ maks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch-kj] use list_for_each() in fs/jffs/intrep.c
2004-07-23 19:02 ` Domen Puncer
@ 2004-07-29 11:33 ` Domen Puncer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Domen Puncer @ 2004-07-29 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: jffs-dev
In gmane.linux.kernel Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:17:24 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:55:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>>>
>>> Use list_for_each() where applicable
>>> - for (list = ymf_devs.next; list != &ymf_devs; list = list->next) {
>>> + list_for_each(list, &ymf_devs) {
>>> pure cosmetic change, defined as a preprocessor macro in:
>>> include/linux/list.h
>>>
>>> applies cleanly to 2.6.8-rc2
>>>
>>> From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
>>
>> Please switch to list_for_each_entry while you're at it.
>
> Jup, list_for_each_entry is nicer.
> (first time posting trough gmane, hope it works)
>
> Compile tested
But wrong (sorry), here is the fixed patch:
(This, along with some other list_for_each_entry patches will also be posted
to kernel-janitor ml)
Use list_for_each_entry to make code more readable.
Compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
--- c/fs/jffs/intrep.c Wed Jul 14 19:15:11 2004
+++ list_for_each/fs/jffs/intrep.c Wed Jul 28 20:34:06 2004
@@ -1619,12 +1619,10 @@
{
struct jffs_file *f;
int i = ino % c->hash_len;
- struct list_head *tmp;
D3(printk("jffs_find_file(): ino: %u\n", ino));
- for (tmp = c->hash[i].next; tmp != &c->hash[i]; tmp = tmp->next) {
- f = list_entry(tmp, struct jffs_file, hash);
+ list_for_each_entry(f, &c->hash[i], hash) {
if (ino != f->ino)
continue;
D3(printk("jffs_find_file(): Found file with ino "
@@ -2020,13 +2018,12 @@
int result = 0;
for (pos = 0; pos < c->hash_len; pos++) {
- struct list_head *p, *next;
- for (p = c->hash[pos].next; p != &c->hash[pos]; p = next) {
- /* We need a reference to the next file in the
- list because `func' might remove the current
- file `f'. */
- next = p->next;
- r = func(list_entry(p, struct jffs_file, hash));
+ struct jffs_file *f, *next;
+
+ /* We must do _safe, because 'func' might remove the
+ current file 'f' from the list. */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(f, next, &c->hash[pos], hash) {
+ r = func(f);
if (r < 0)
return r;
result += r;
@@ -2589,9 +2586,8 @@
printk("JFFS: Dumping the file system's hash table...\n");
for (i = 0; i < c->hash_len; i++) {
- struct list_head *p;
- for (p = c->hash[i].next; p != &c->hash[i]; p = p->next) {
- struct jffs_file *f=list_entry(p,struct jffs_file,hash);
+ struct jffs_file *f;
+ list_for_each_entry(f, &c->hash[i], hash) {
printk("*** c->hash[%u]: \"%s\" "
"(ino: %u, pino: %u)\n",
i, (f->name ? f->name : ""),
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-29 11:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-23 15:55 [patch-kj] use list_for_each() in fs/jffs/intrep.c maximilian attems
2004-07-23 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-23 19:02 ` Domen Puncer
2004-07-29 11:33 ` Domen Puncer
2004-07-25 12:15 ` maximilian attems
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox