From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] consolidate sched domains
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:22:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040726022202.GA21602@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407231450.47070.suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 02:50:46PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Friday 23 July 2004 08:30, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> > Do other architectures need to define their own cpu_sibling_maps, or am I
> > missing something that would define that for IA64 and others?
>
> Nick means, all the architectures which use CONFIG_SCHED_SMT needs to define
> cpu_sibling_map.
>
> Nick, aren't you missing the attached fix in your patch?
>
> thanks,
> suresh
Ok, but cpu_to_phys_group() does a lookup in cpu_sibling map:
__init static int cpu_to_phys_group(int cpu)
{
return first_cpu(cpu_sibling_map[cpu]);
}
and is called from outside of a CONFIG_SCHED_SMT ifdef here:
sd = &per_cpu(phys_domains, i);
==> group = cpu_to_phys_group(i);
*sd = SD_CPU_INIT;
sd->span = nodemask;
sd->parent = p;
sd->groups = &sched_group_phys[group];
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
p = sd;
sd = &per_cpu(cpu_domains, i);
..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-26 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 3:18 [PATCH] consolidate sched domains Nick Piggin
2004-07-23 5:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-23 15:30 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2004-07-23 21:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2004-07-24 3:09 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 2:22 ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2004-07-26 4:05 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 18:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-27 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-27 16:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-28 1:08 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040726022202.GA21602@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox