public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>,
	"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	cw@f00f.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel events layer
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:03:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040726190305.GA19498@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407262013.33454.oliver@neukum.org>

On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 08:13:33PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Montag, 26. Juli 2004 18:12 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > If Greg can come up with a solution for using kobjects, I am all for
> > > that - that would be great - but I really do not see kobject paths
> > > working out. ?I think the best we have is the file path in the tree.
> > 
> > Give me a few days, I'm working on it, but have been traveling too much.
> > Robert and I will sit down during OSCON this week and try to work out
> > something along these lines, and then post it again here.
> 
> On a related note, is this supposed to supersede the current hotplug
> mechanism?

No, it will not.  At the most, it will report the same information to
make it easier for userspace programs who want to get the other
event information, also get the hotplug stuff through the same
interface, reducing their complexity.

So the existing hotplug interface is not going away at all.  Do not even
begin to think that :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-26 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-26  7:31 [patch] kernel events layer Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 14:50 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 16:12   ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 18:13     ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-26 18:15       ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 19:03       ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-07-26 20:44         ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-27 18:15           ` Mike Waychison
2004-07-27 18:35             ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-27 18:37             ` Tim Hockin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 22:58 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-27  7:08 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-26  6:04 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26  6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 23:00   ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-23 17:41 Robert Love
2004-07-23 18:25 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-07-23 18:35   ` Robert Love
2004-07-23 21:32 ` Dan Aloni
2004-07-24  2:47   ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  4:42     ` Keith Owens
2004-07-24  5:00       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  8:11         ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24  5:37           ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  6:02             ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  9:43               ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-07-24 20:21               ` James Morris
2004-07-25  2:12                 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  6:53       ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-24 11:37       ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-07-24  3:02 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24  3:14   ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  9:15     ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 15:08     ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 15:45       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 17:33         ` Ryan Anderson
2004-07-24 17:46         ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-24 18:19           ` Robert Love
2004-07-25 18:11             ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-25 19:08               ` Robert Love
2004-07-27  5:09                 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-07-24 17:54         ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 18:13           ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 20:08             ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-07-26 20:10               ` Robert Love
2004-08-09 13:29     ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-09 19:47       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  3:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24  2:14   ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  5:15     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24  5:41       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  5:45         ` Chris Wedgwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040726190305.GA19498@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=rml@ximian.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox