From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: colpatch@us.ibm.com
Cc: jbarnes@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mbligh@aracnet.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Change pcibus_to_cpumask() to pcibus_to_node()
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:16:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040727161628.56a03aec.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090887007.16676.18.camel@arrakis>
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:10:08 -0700
Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> So in discussions with Jesse at OLS, we decided that pcibus_to_node() is
> a more generally useful function than pcibus_to_cpumask(). If anyone
> disagrees with that, now would be a good time to let us know.
Not sure that is a good idea. Sometimes this information is not available.
With pcibus_to_cpumask() the fallback is obvious, but it isn't with
pcibus_to_node(). Returning a random node is wrong.
> This is just a preliminary patch. It needs review for x86_64, as I
> don't know how to properly populate the mp_bus_to_node (which used to be
> mp_bus_to_cpumask) array.
It's impossible currently - I need an ACPI 3.0 BIOS to get this information.
Even then there will be machines who don't supply it.
I tried some time ago to get it from the hardware, but the hardware registers
were arcane enough that I didn't find it easy enough. Relying on firmware
for this thing is probably a better idea anyways.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-27 0:10 [RFC][PATCH] Change pcibus_to_cpumask() to pcibus_to_node() Matthew Dobson
2004-07-27 3:38 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-27 9:51 ` [Lse-tech] " Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-27 15:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-27 18:32 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-27 18:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-29 0:06 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-29 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-29 22:23 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-30 15:36 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 22:17 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-30 22:21 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 22:33 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-29 17:02 ` Rajesh Shah
2004-07-29 22:27 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-30 0:02 ` Rajesh Shah
2004-07-28 15:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-07-28 19:10 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-27 14:16 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-07-27 15:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-27 15:57 ` Andi Kleen
2004-07-27 18:18 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-07-29 8:34 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040727161628.56a03aec.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox