From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266925AbUG1OJk (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:09:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267164AbUG1OJk (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:09:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:34220 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266925AbUG1OJj (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:09:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:08:46 -0400 From: Alan Cox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Alan Cox , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Add support for Innovision DM-8401H Message-ID: <20040728140846.GA23938@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040728134910.GA8514@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200407281610.54961.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407281610.54961.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 04:10:54PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Wednesday 28 of July 2004 15:49, Alan Cox wrote: > > This is an SII 680 with strange PCI identifiers it appears > No, this is a different chipset (produced by ITE). Ok then its a different chipset produced by ITE which appears to work perfectly with the SII driver, rather like the different chipset produced by Adaptec that is bug compatible and register identical with the SI3112 > I asked you to compare Sil and ITE datasheets > (as I don't have one for Sil0680). > > Have you done this? I don't have the ITE datasheet. Alan