From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: olh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 check
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:00:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040728150052.4effe78a.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040728154630.GN10891@smtp.west.cox.net>
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> The following patch does three things. First, it removes all instances
> of:
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_FOO),y)
> AFLAGS += -Wa,-mfoo
> endif
>
> and makes us set them once in arch/ppc/Makefile, via
> aflags-$(CONFIG_FOO), just like we do for CFLAGS. Next it adds a test
> for gcc-3.4 and binutils-2.14. The problem with this combination is
> that the -many flag is broken in binutils-2.14 and gcc-3.4 will pass it
> down, causing other flags to be overridden and the compile to fail.
> Changing gcc or binutils versions fixes this. Finally, it changes
> places in the Makefiles where we did:
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_FOO),y)
> obj-$(CONFIG_BAR) += foo_bar.o
> endif
> into
> obj-$(CONFIG_FOO) += $(bar-y)
> bar-$(CONFIG_BAR) += foo_bar.o
Unfortunately this has significant clashes with the mpc52xx bk tree
which I'm carrying.
That patch has been sitting around for several weeks now - can we get it
merged up first?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-28 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 15:46 [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 check Tom Rini
2004-07-28 22:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-07-28 22:07 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-28 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-29 15:04 ` Sylvain Munaut
2004-07-29 8:05 ` [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 c Giuliano Pochini
2004-07-29 14:43 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-30 18:59 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-07-30 19:07 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-30 20:48 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-07-30 21:03 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-04 10:22 ` Wolfram Quester
2004-08-04 10:41 ` Guido Guenther
2004-08-04 12:37 ` Guido Guenther
2004-08-05 14:12 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 16:54 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 17:00 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 17:20 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 17:39 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 18:03 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 18:00 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 18:14 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 19:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-08-05 21:03 ` Matt Porter
2004-08-06 15:32 ` Olaf Hering
[not found] ` <hhacx8hirb.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de>
2004-08-06 15:38 ` [PATCH] ppc32: Fix building of certain CPU types (Was: Re: [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14) Tom Rini
2004-08-02 7:45 ` [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 c Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040728150052.4effe78a.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
--cc=tnt@246tNt.com \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox