From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
haveblue@us.ibm.com, linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Oops in find_busiest_group(): 2.6.8-rc1-mm1
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:49:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407290849.42271.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040729153510.GB1141@sgi.com>
On Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:35 am, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> Here's a patch to 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 that allows things to work:
>
> --- sched.c.old 2004-07-29 10:11:00.000000000 -0500
> +++ sched.c 2004-07-29 10:27:58.000000000 -0500
> @@ -3770,8 +3770,6 @@ __init static void arch_init_sched_domai
> cpumask_t nodemask = node_to_cpumask(cpu_to_node(i));
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> - if (i != first_cpu(sd->groups->cpumask))
> - continue;
> sd = &per_cpu(node_domains, i);
> group = cpu_to_node_group(i);
> *sd = SD_NODE_INIT;
Yep, this was a merge error. I posted it as the first reply (f1rst p0st!) to
Andrew's 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 announcement. Sorry for the trouble, my last patch
didn't include it, but there was some confusion since there were several
fixes to the scheduler code posted to Nick's 'consolidate sched domains'
thread.
Jesse
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-29 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-15 6:04 Oops in find_busiest_group(): 2.6.8-rc1-mm1 Dave Hansen
2004-07-15 6:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-29 6:42 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-29 8:33 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-29 9:29 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-29 10:36 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-29 12:22 ` Dave Hansen
2004-07-29 15:35 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2004-07-29 15:49 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407290849.42271.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox