From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264643AbUG2Njw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:39:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264647AbUG2Njw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:39:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:13732 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264643AbUG2Njs (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:39:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:39:03 -0400 From: Alan Cox To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix ide probe double detection Message-ID: <20040729133903.GA12406@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040727224629.GA17147@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1091071364.13625.37.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091071364.13625.37.camel@gaston> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:22:44PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I don't like relying on drive->id and serial_no, but that may just be > paranoia... I've seen no evidence to indicate anyone has duplicate serial numbers even with CF cards so I think its fine. The problem with playing with registers and seeing if they stick is that on the newer cards the register bank you are programming is sometimes a fifo ahead of the real drive. Alan