public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:09:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040730020910.GA30369@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040729185215.Q1973@build.pdx.osdl.net>

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:52:15PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> 1) hugetlb accounting is not done. so it's only simple change to checking
> permission, but the acutal usage is not tracked (gets back to problem
> andrea pointed out).  with this patch, wouldn't !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)
> && rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur == 1 be enough to get all the hugepages
> a user would want (i.e. security hole)?

exactly, you beaten me on reply-speed ;).

And this patch is needed primarly to get access to hugetlbfs without
IPC_CAP_LOCK as Arjan mentioned.

> I do agree, however, that storing in user struct allows for quota like
> accounting that matches the shm_lock and hugetlb use cases.

Looking forward to see hugetlbfs working with user quota too...
rlimit user-quota is certainly a reasonable approach, though I'm not
sure what happens if root runs chown, that's funny not? Comments?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-30  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-29 10:03 [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-29 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-29 21:40   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-30  0:50     ` Rik van Riel
2004-07-30  2:16       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-30  0:51   ` Rik van Riel
2004-07-30  2:17     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-30  1:52 ` Chris Wright
2004-07-30  2:09   ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-07-30  2:46   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 20:54   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:45     ` Chris Wright
2004-08-03 20:55   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:07     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:13       ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-03 21:36         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:38           ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-03 21:51             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 22:01               ` Chris Wright
2004-08-03 22:11                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 22:33                   ` Chris Wright
2004-08-03 22:42                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 22:52                       ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04  1:21                   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  1:53                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  2:01                       ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  2:13                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  2:20                           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04  2:22                           ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  2:31                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04  2:56                               ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  6:06                                 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04 13:31                                   ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04 13:51                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-04 13:56                                       ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  3:13                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  2:25                           ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04  2:07                       ` Chris Wright
2004-08-04  2:18                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:13       ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:22         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-03 21:24           ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-03 21:31           ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-03 21:39             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-08-04  1:56               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-03 22:18             ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-08-04  1:22               ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-04  1:37                 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-08-04  1:55                   ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040730020910.GA30369@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox