From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S267859AbUG3Whs@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267859AbUG3Whs (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:37:48 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267842AbUG3Whs
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:37:48 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:38596 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267859AbUG3WhU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:37:20 -0400
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:37:00 -0700
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: "Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY
Message-Id: <20040730153700.2bb46976.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2ZSI4XW+fk25FhAf9BqjtMKAAAAQAAAAto7TSbyGCEOKEjP4Tiu9VgEAAAAA@casabyte.com>
References: <20040729193637.36d018a5.davem@redhat.com>
	<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2ZSI4XW+fk25FhAf9BqjtMKAAAAQAAAAto7TSbyGCEOKEjP4Tiu9VgEAAAAA@casabyte.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:02:33 -0700
"Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com> wrote:

> 4) Cork-then-uncork would still end up with two syscalls instead of one.

Syscalls are incredible cheap, this is not an argument for not
using cork'ing.