From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266339AbUHBHqF (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 03:46:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266341AbUHBHqE (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 03:46:04 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:8110 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266339AbUHBHqB (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 03:46:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:45:53 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Tom Rini Cc: Giuliano Pochini , kumar.gala@freescale.com, tnt@246tNt.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 c Message-ID: <20040802074553.GA4998@suse.de> References: <20040728220733.GA16468@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040729144347.GE16468@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040730205901.4d4181f4.pochini@shiny.it> <20040730190731.GQ16468@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040730190731.GQ16468@smtp.west.cox.net> X-DOS: I got your 640K Real Mode Right Here Buddy! X-Homeland-Security: You are not supposed to read this line! You are a terrorist! User-Agent: Mutt und vi sind doch schneller als Notes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 30, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 08:59:01PM +0200, Giuliano Pochini wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:43:47 -0700 > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > I had no time to do a lot of testing, but it seems that binutils 2.15 + > > > > gcc 3.3.3 is a bad one too. I didn't try to compile the kernel (which > > > > may also break), but at least I couldn't compile gcc 3.4.1 with the > > > > above combination. It seems that as doesn't get the -mxxx parameter > > > > required to compile altivec stuff. Hacking the Makefile to make it > > > > pass -Wa,-m7455 helped a little, but it eventually failed in another > > > > weird way. I hadn't time to investigate further, sorry. > > > > > > Stock gcc-3.3.3 or from the hammer branch ? > > > > Stock. > > That is interesting. Olaf, is gcc-3.3.x + binutils-2.15 one of the > combinations you've got in your matrix of toolchains? yes, it worked ok for kernel builds. gcc-3_3-branch + binutils 2.15 -- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG