From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266858AbUHCVZY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:25:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266867AbUHCVZY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:25:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54715 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266858AbUHCVZT (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:25:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:24:26 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Rik van Riel , Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted Message-ID: <20040803212426.GA5113@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040803210737.GI2241@dualathlon.random> <20040803212231.GJ2241@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040803212231.GJ2241@dualathlon.random> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:22:31PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > I agree there aren't security issues, but it's still very wrong to > charge the old user if the admin gives the locked ram to a new user. no he gives the FILE to the new user. Which 1) is rare and 2) doesn't mean the old user stopped using it --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBEAKJxULwo51rQBIRAv31AJ0bdFdctHAlIxQrw3jwLxS9Z3XAfwCcCRZB vtkHlF3OXp+x7N6c4pdlGmA= =Srs4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--