From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: dipankar@in.ibm.com, shemminger@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] Updated RCU documentation improvement
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 07:16:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040804141608.GA1865@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello!
Updated based on feedback, and to apply to 2.6.8-rc3. I will be
adding more detailed documentation to the Documentation directory
in a separate patch.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5/include/linux/rcupdate.h linux-2.5.rcu_read_lock_comments/include/linux/rcupdate.h
--- linux-2.5/include/linux/rcupdate.h Mon Aug 2 11:32:10 2004
+++ linux-2.5.rcu_read_lock_comments/include/linux/rcupdate.h Wed Aug 4 06:32:07 2004
@@ -133,8 +133,53 @@ static inline int rcu_pending(int cpu)
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * rcu_read_lock - mark the beginning of an RCU read-side critical section.
+ *
+ * When synchronize_kernel() is invoked on one CPU while other CPUs
+ * are within RCU read-side critical sections, then the
+ * synchronize_kernel() is guaranteed to block until after all the other
+ * CPUs exit their critical sections. Similarly, if call_rcu() is invoked
+ * on one CPU while other CPUs are within RCU read-side critical
+ * sections, invocation of the corresponding RCU callback is deferred
+ * until after the all the other CPUs exit their critical sections.
+ *
+ * Note, however, that RCU callbacks are permitted to run concurrently
+ * with RCU read-side critical sections. One way that this can happen
+ * is via the following sequence of events: (1) CPU 0 enters an RCU
+ * read-side critical section, (2) CPU 1 invokes call_rcu() to register
+ * an RCU callback, (3) CPU 0 exits the RCU read-side critical section,
+ * (4) CPU 2 enters a RCU read-side critical section, (5) the RCU
+ * callback is invoked. This is legal, because the RCU read-side critical
+ * section that was running concurrently with the call_rcu() (and which
+ * therefore might be referencing something that the corresponding RCU
+ * callback would free up) has completed before the corresponding
+ * RCU callback is invoked.
+ *
+ * RCU read-side critical sections may be nested. Any deferred actions
+ * will be deferred until the outermost RCU read-side critical section
+ * completes.
+ *
+ * It is illegal to block while in an RCU read-side critical section.
+ */
#define rcu_read_lock() preempt_disable()
+
+/**
+ * rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section.
+ *
+ * See rcu_read_lock() for more information.
+ */
#define rcu_read_unlock() preempt_enable()
+
+/*
+ * So where is rcu_write_lock()? It does not exist, as there is no
+ * way for writers to lock out RCU readers. This is a feature, not
+ * a bug -- this property is what provides RCU's performance benefits.
+ * Of course, writers must coordinate with each other. The normal
+ * spinlock primitives work well for this, but any other technique may be
+ * used as well. RCU does not care how the writers keep out of each
+ * others' way, as long as they do so.
+ */
extern void rcu_init(void);
extern void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user);
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5/kernel/rcupdate.c linux-2.5.rcu_read_lock_comments/kernel/rcupdate.c
--- linux-2.5/kernel/rcupdate.c Mon Aug 2 11:32:13 2004
+++ linux-2.5.rcu_read_lock_comments/kernel/rcupdate.c Wed Aug 4 06:34:27 2004
@@ -65,14 +65,15 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_str
#define RCU_tasklet(cpu) (per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu))
/**
- * call_rcu - Queue an RCU update request.
+ * call_rcu - Queue an RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
* @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
* @func: actual update function to be invoked after the grace period
*
- * The update function will be invoked as soon as all CPUs have performed
- * a context switch or been seen in the idle loop or in a user process.
- * The read-side of critical section that use call_rcu() for updation must
- * be protected by rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock().
+ * The update function will be invoked some time after a full grace
+ * period elapses, in other words after all currently executing RCU
+ * read-side critical sections have completed. RCU read-side critical
+ * sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(),
+ * and may be nested.
*/
void fastcall call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
@@ -370,8 +371,13 @@ static void wakeme_after_rcu(struct rcu_
}
/**
- * synchronize-kernel - wait until all the CPUs have gone
- * through a "quiescent" state. It may sleep.
+ * synchronize_kernel - wait until a grace period has elapsed.
+ *
+ * Control will return to the caller some time after a full grace
+ * period has elapsed, in other words after all currently executing RCU
+ * read-side critical sections have completed. RCU read-side critical
+ * sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(),
+ * and may be nested.
*/
void synchronize_kernel(void)
{
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-04 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-04 14:16 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2004-08-04 22:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] Updated RCU documentation improvement Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-04 23:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040804141608.GA1865@us.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox