From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266242AbUHDPEU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:04:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266245AbUHDPEU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:04:20 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:47513 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266242AbUHDPER (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:04:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:04:04 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: block layer sg, bsg Message-ID: <20040804150403.GU10340@suse.de> References: <20040804085000.GH10340@suse.de> <20040804075215.155c06ac.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040804075215.155c06ac.davem@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 04 2004, David S. Miller wrote: > > When you pass data structures in via {read,write}{,v}() system calls, > you make it next to impossible for the CONFIG_COMPAT layer to cope > with this. > > Please consider another way to pass in those sg_io_* things. Any suggestions? -- Jens Axboe