From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267652AbUHELwe (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 07:52:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267653AbUHELwc (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 07:52:32 -0400 Received: from colin2.muc.de ([193.149.48.15]:11283 "HELO colin2.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267651AbUHELtW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 07:49:22 -0400 Date: 5 Aug 2004 13:49:17 +0200 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:49:17 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" Cc: davem@redhat.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: block layer sg, bsg Message-ID: <20040805114917.GC31944@muc.de> References: <20040804191850.GA19224@havoc.gtf.org> <20040804122254.3d52c2d4.davem@redhat.com> <20040804232116.GA30152@muc.de> <20040804.165113.06226042.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040804.165113.06226042.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Well, 32bit ipsec on x86-64/ia64 is a NOP because of that. > > Hmm, I don't get the point. > What part (or which structore) is broken? xfrm_usersa_info due to inclusion of xfrm_lifetime_cfg/xfrm_lifetime_cur The xfrm layer uses it like an array, but they have different sizes on x86-64 and i386. -Andi