From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@vger.kernel.org, rl@hellgate.ch
Subject: Re: [proc.txt] Fix /proc/pid/statm documentation
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:48:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040806034859.GQ17188@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091754711.1231.2388.camel@cube>
Roger Luethi writes:
>> I really wanted /proc/pid/statm to die [1] and I still believe the
>> reasoning is valid. As it doesn't look like that is going to happen,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:11:52PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> It would be awful to lose statm, especially since WLI has fixes
> for some of the problems. Just why do you want to kill statm?
> Now quoting from your patch...
Just to cite my own sources, the fixes I had were forward ports of RHAS
patches for statm accounting at the time of pte modification.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-06 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-06 1:11 [proc.txt] Fix /proc/pid/statm documentation Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 3:48 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-08-06 9:40 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 10:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 12:01 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 12:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 13:57 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 14:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 15:02 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 14:02 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 17:08 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 15:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 20:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 18:38 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 21:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-07 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2004-08-06 12:58 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 15:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 14:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 16:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 16:34 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 14:51 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 17:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 18:21 ` Roger Luethi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-05 17:10 Roger Luethi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040806034859.GQ17188@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rl@hellgate.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox