From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266256AbUHFDtI (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:49:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266454AbUHFDtI (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:49:08 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:17864 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266256AbUHFDtG (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:49:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:48:59 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Albert Cahalan Cc: linux-kernel mailing list , linux-mm@vger.kernel.org, rl@hellgate.ch Subject: Re: [proc.txt] Fix /proc/pid/statm documentation Message-ID: <20040806034859.GQ17188@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Albert Cahalan , linux-kernel mailing list , linux-mm@vger.kernel.org, rl@hellgate.ch References: <1091754711.1231.2388.camel@cube> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091754711.1231.2388.camel@cube> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roger Luethi writes: >> I really wanted /proc/pid/statm to die [1] and I still believe the >> reasoning is valid. As it doesn't look like that is going to happen, On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:11:52PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > It would be awful to lose statm, especially since WLI has fixes > for some of the problems. Just why do you want to kill statm? > Now quoting from your patch... Just to cite my own sources, the fixes I had were forward ports of RHAS patches for statm accounting at the time of pte modification. -- wli