From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263735AbUHGRBn (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:01:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263626AbUHGRBn (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:01:43 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:8185 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263725AbUHGRB3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:01:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:01:22 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: wli@holomorphy.com, davem@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: linux390@de.ibm.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA" Message-ID: <20040807170122.GM17708@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The following architetures have their own "config PCMCIA" instead of including drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig (in 2.6.8-rc3-mm1): - m68k - s390 - sparc - sparc64 Is there any good reason for this, or would a patch to change these architectures to include drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig be OK? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed