From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263725AbUHGRLZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:11:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263714AbUHGRLZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:11:25 -0400 Received: from imladris.demon.co.uk ([193.237.130.41]:62476 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263626AbUHGRLX (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:11:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:10:51 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Adrian Bunk Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, davem@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA" Message-ID: <20040807181051.A19250@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Adrian Bunk , wli@holomorphy.com, davem@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040807170122.GM17708@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040807170122.GM17708@fs.tum.de>; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:01:22PM +0200 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by phoenix.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:01:22PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The following architetures have their own "config PCMCIA" instead of > including drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig (in 2.6.8-rc3-mm1): > - m68k > - s390 > - sparc > - sparc64 > > Is there any good reason for this, or would a patch to change these > architectures to include drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig be OK? What about switching them to use drivers/Kconfig instead?