From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
wli@holomorphy.com, davem@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:12:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408072013.01168.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040807172518.GA25169@fs.tum.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 06:10:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > What about switching them to use drivers/Kconfig instead?
I'd prefer not to switch s390 to use drivers/Kconfig unless someone
volunteers to clean up all included Kconfig files by adding proper
'depends on PCI' etc. flags. Otherwise too many broken options are
offered.
On Samstag, 7. August 2004 19:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Is there eny reason for such options that are never visible nor enabled,
> or could they be removed?
Yes, the reason is that some other options depend on them. We added the
PCMCIA option to arch/s390/Kconfig to stop kbuild from asking about
some drivers that won't work anyway.
E.g. drivers/scsi/pcmcia starts with
menu "PCMCIA SCSI adapter support"
depends on SCSI!=n && PCMCIA!=n && MODULES
which evaluate to true if the PCMCIA option is not known. Changing
that to
menu "PCMCIA SCSI adapter support"
depends on SCSI && PCMCIA && MODULES
solves this in a different way, but I'm not 100% sure if it still has
the same meaning.
Arnd <><
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-07 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-07 17:01 architectures with their own "config PCMCIA" Adrian Bunk
2004-08-07 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-07 17:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-07 18:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2004-08-07 20:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-07 21:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-08-11 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-11 20:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-11 21:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-08-12 0:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-12 8:59 ` Roman Zippel
2004-08-14 20:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-15 17:32 ` Roman Zippel
2004-08-15 19:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-15 20:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-15 23:01 ` Roman Zippel
2004-08-15 23:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-11 21:45 ` Roman Zippel
2004-08-12 0:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-12 2:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-11 16:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408072013.01168.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox