From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265789AbUHIBzb (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 21:55:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265792AbUHIBzb (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 21:55:31 -0400 Received: from [61.155.114.21] ([61.155.114.21]:1042 "EHLO mail.mobilesoft.com.cn") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265789AbUHIBza (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 21:55:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:59:51 +0800 From: Wu Jian Feng To: David Woodhouse Cc: Linux Kernel List , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Russell King Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.8-rc3 slab corruption (jffs2?) Message-ID: <20040809015950.GA20408@mobilesoft.com.cn> Mail-Followup-To: David Woodhouse , Linux Kernel List , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Russell King References: <20040807150458.E2805@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040808061206.GA5417@mobilesoft.com.cn> <1091962414.1438.977.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091962414.1438.977.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:53:34AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 14:12 +0800, Wu Jian Feng wrote: > > Can't figure out why but have a quick workaround for this: > > Erases are permitted to be asynchronous -- if the erase was submitted > sucessfully, you may not free the object until the callback is called. > You _may_ free the object from the callback, and we do. > > Can I infer from this that you've actually seen the same problem? Could > you reproduce it? What arch, compiler, etc? > > -- > dwmw2 > > I see the same thing as rmk, used both gcc-3.3.2 and 3.4.0, on a OMAP730 (arm926ejs).