public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>
Cc: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel events layer
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040809132907.GA1792@openzaurus.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090638881.2296.14.camel@localhost>

Hi!

> > Should there be some sharing with the device naming of sysfs or are
> > will we introduce a new one? ie sysfs uses:
> >
> > devices/system/cpu/cpu0/<blah>
> >
> > Would it be a better way to have a version that takes struct kobject
> > to enforce consistency in the device naming scheme. This also means
> > userspace would automatically know where to look in /sys if futher
> > info was needed.
> 
> No, we want to give an interface that matches the sort of provider URI
> used by object systems such as CORBA, D-BUS, and DCOP.  We also do _not_
> want to put policy in the kernel.

Funny... you want to create new namespace and argue "no policy".

If you want to translate it to something URI-like, you should
do that in userspace. 

-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-09 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-23 17:41 [patch] kernel events layer Robert Love
2004-07-23 18:25 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-07-23 18:35   ` Robert Love
2004-07-23 21:32 ` Dan Aloni
2004-07-24  2:47   ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  4:42     ` Keith Owens
2004-07-24  5:00       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  8:11         ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24  5:37           ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  6:02             ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  9:43               ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-07-24 20:21               ` James Morris
2004-07-25  2:12                 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  6:53       ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-24 11:37       ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-07-24  3:02 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24  3:14   ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  9:15     ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 15:08     ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 15:45       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 17:33         ` Ryan Anderson
2004-07-24 17:46         ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-24 18:19           ` Robert Love
2004-07-25 18:11             ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-25 19:08               ` Robert Love
2004-07-27  5:09                 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-07-24 17:54         ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 18:13           ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 20:08             ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-07-26 20:10               ` Robert Love
2004-08-09 13:29     ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-08-09 19:47       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  3:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24  2:14   ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  5:15     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24  5:41       ` Robert Love
2004-07-24  5:45         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24  3:11   ` [patch] kernel events layer, updated Robert Love
2004-07-24  7:58     ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24  8:23       ` Deepak Saxena
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26  6:04 [patch] kernel events layer Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26  6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 23:00   ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-26  7:31 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 14:50 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 16:12   ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 18:13     ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-26 18:15       ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 19:03       ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 20:44         ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-27 18:15           ` Mike Waychison
2004-07-27 18:35             ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-27 18:37             ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-26 22:58 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-27  7:08 ` Deepak Saxena

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040809132907.GA1792@openzaurus.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@metaparadigm.com \
    --cc=rml@ximian.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox