From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Josh Radel <jraidman-linux@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: elevator abstraction, anticipatory I/O backported to 2.4?
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:29:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040809182921.GA28302@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040807000316.85612.qmail@web81706.mail.yahoo.com>
On Fri, Aug 06 2004, Josh Radel wrote:
> Are there any existing patches for a backport of the
> 2.6 elevator abstraction (or a specific patch for
> anticipatory I/O) to 2.4 kernels?
It would be hard to do. In fact it can't be done without hacking the
drivers to use it as well. So it might be doable just for fun, but not
as something maintainable.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-09 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-07 0:03 elevator abstraction, anticipatory I/O backported to 2.4? Josh Radel
2004-08-07 5:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-09 18:29 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040809182921.GA28302@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jraidman-linux@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox