From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S267391AbUHJBy6@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267391AbUHJBy6 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:54:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267390AbUHJBy6
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:54:58 -0400
Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67]:60292 "EHLO
	imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S267391AbUHJBy4 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:54:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:55:02 -0500
From: Tommy Reynolds <Tommy.Reynolds@MegaCoder.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bug zapper?  :)
Message-Id: <20040809205502.62bec992.Tommy.Reynolds@MegaCoder.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1BuKyX-0005hJ-00@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net>
References: <41180443.9030900@comcast.net>
	<E1BuKyX-0005hJ-00@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12cvs1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-redhat-linux-gnu)
X-Face: Nr)Jjr<W18$]W/d|XHLW^SD-p`}1dn36lQW,d\ZWA<OQ/XI;UrUc3hmj)pX]@n%_4n{Zsg$
 t1p@38D[d"JHj~~JSE_udbw@N4Bu/@w(cY^04u#JmXEUCd]l1$;K|zeo!c.#0In"/d.y*U~/_c7lIl
 5{0^<~0pk_ET.]:MP_Aq)D@1AIQf.juXKc2u[2pSqNSi3IpsmZc\ep9!XTmHwx
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Uttered Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de>, spake thus:

> - no comments are better than wrong comments
> - code which is understandable w/o comments is better than commented code

Therefore, kernel code is better than wrong comments?

Just trying to complete the syllogism ;-)