From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch] 2.6.8-rc4: compile error with gcc 2.95
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:39:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040810183955.GR26174@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408091958450.1839@ppc970.osdl.org>
I'm still getting a flood of the following errors when using gcc 2.95:
<-- snip -->
...
if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.6.8-rc4; fi
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/ymfpci/snd-ymfpci.ko
needs unknown symbol free_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/ymfpci/snd-ymfpci.ko
needs unknown symbol request_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/vx222/snd-vx222.ko
needs unknown symbol free_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/vx222/snd-vx222.ko
needs unknown symbol request_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/trident/snd-trident.ko
needs unknown symbol free_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/trident/snd-trident.ko
needs unknown symbol request_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/snd-via82xx.ko needs
unknown symbol free_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/snd-via82xx.ko needs
unknown symbol request_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/snd-sonicvibes.ko needs
unknown symbol free_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/snd-sonicvibes.ko needs
unknown symbol request_irq
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.8-rc4/kernel/sound/pci/snd-rme96.ko needs
unknown symbol free_irq
... [several hundred similar lines siped]
<-- snip -->
The following patch (as 268-rc2-mm1-link-errors.patch already in -mm)
fixes this issue:
<-- snip -->
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Investigation of why the build is failing due to bogus detection of
undefined symbols: We're getting this warning:
arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:3565: Warning: setting incorrect section type for
.bss.page_aligned
Which comes from this code in the 4k stacks code:
static char softirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE), __section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
static char hardirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE), __section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
Removing the __section__() fixes it, as does moving to gcc 3.2 or 3.3,
but gcc 2.95 and 3.0 still exhibit the problem. It seems the 4k stack
developers like newer compilers than I do :)
The gcc 2.95 section declaration looks like this:
.section .bss.page_aligned,"aw",@progbits
while the 3.1 section looks like this:
.section .bss.page_aligned,"aw",@nobits
It's definitely a bug that's been fixed:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00507.html
I've been told that I can fix it with a carefully crafted assembly file and
maybe a change to the linker script, but all that it buys us is a little
space in the uncompressed kernel image. Plus, the warning will still be
there at compile-time.
I say, put them back in plain old BSS. Patch attached.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
---
25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/irq.c~268-rc2-mm1-link-errors arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
--- 25/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c~268-rc2-mm1-link-errors 2004-07-28 22:11:29.652159016 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c 2004-07-28 22:11:29.658158104 -0700
@@ -1118,8 +1118,12 @@ void init_irq_proc (void)
#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
-static char softirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE), __section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
-static char hardirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE), __section__(".bss.page_aligned")));
+/*
+ * These should really be __section__(".bss.page_aligned") as well, but
+ * gcc's 3.0 and earlier don't handle that correctly.
+ */
+static char softirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE)));
+static char hardirq_stack[NR_CPUS * THREAD_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(THREAD_SIZE)));
/*
* allocate per-cpu stacks for hardirq and for softirq processing
_
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-10 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 3:03 Linux 2.6.8-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2004-08-10 8:33 ` Linux 2.6.8-rc4 [RESEND] via-rhine: Really call rhine_power_init() Roger Luethi
2004-08-10 14:34 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-13 4:45 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-13 8:44 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-13 15:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-13 17:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-13 22:06 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-16 12:45 ` Patrick McFarland
2004-08-10 17:37 ` Linux 2.6.8-rc4 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-08-10 18:39 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040810183955.GR26174@fs.tum.de \
--to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox