public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: V13 <v13@priest.com>
To: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bug zapper?  :)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:30:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408110030.37601.v13@priest.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4117D98C.2030203@comcast.net>

On Monday 09 August 2004 23:07, John Richard Moser wrote:
> What I found interesting was that it described bugs as
> pseudo-quantitative based on the KLOC (thousands of lines of code) for a
> code body.  The basic theory boils down to 5-50 bugs per 1000 LOC,
> approaching 5 for QA audited code.  Thus, 10000 LOC executable, 50 bugs.

I believe that you should not believe such things. They are just statistics 
and nothing more. 

If you have a 1000 lines project and:

a) Remove all empty lines means that you remove bugs?
b) Split it to 5 libraries and 5 utilities (10 projects) means that you'll 
have less bugs? 
c) ....

I don't take generalizations like this seriously and I believe that noone 
should do. It may be true that 10.000 lines of code contain 50 bugs as an 
average of all the code that has be written so far but it doesn't mean that:

a) 50 bugs require 10.000 lines
b) 50 bugs will always exist on 10.000 lines
c) All the projects out there have the same number of bugs/line

> --John
<<V13>>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-10 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-09 20:07 [RFC] Bug zapper? :) John Richard Moser
     [not found] ` <200408100042.37159.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-08-09 23:09   ` John Richard Moser
2004-08-10  0:58     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-10  1:55       ` Tommy Reynolds
2004-08-10  2:47     ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-10  3:13       ` John Richard Moser
2004-08-10  8:35     ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-08-10 15:19       ` John Richard Moser
2004-08-10 21:43         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-10 21:30 ` V13 [this message]
2004-08-10 23:35   ` John Richard Moser
2004-08-11  4:50   ` Bernd Eckenfels
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-10 21:13 Nick Warne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200408110030.37601.v13@priest.com \
    --to=v13@priest.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigelenki@comcast.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox