From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268137AbUHKRZi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:25:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268129AbUHKRY2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:24:28 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:44518 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268136AbUHKRXA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:23:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:22:22 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Hemminger , James Ketrenos , Pavel Machek , Jeff Chua , netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel list Subject: Re: ipw2100 wireless driver Message-ID: <20040811172222.GI10100@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20040810075558.A14154@infradead.org> <20040810101640.GF9034@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <4119F203.1070009@linux.intel.com> <20040811114437.A27439@infradead.org> <411A478E.1080101@linux.intel.com> <20040811093043.522cc5a0@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040811163333.GE10100@louise.pinerecords.com> <20040811175105.A30188@infradead.org> <20040811170208.GG10100@louise.pinerecords.com> <20040811181142.A30309@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040811181142.A30309@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Aug-11 2004, Wed, 18:11 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > Agreed. But the point is, in the actual case of ipw2100, will the removal > > of 40 or so lines of code justify killing the functionality for those (lots) > > that use it? > > Yes. Well, "I'm not young enough to know everything." Too bad. And btw, mails to hch@infradead.org bounce. -- Tomas Szepe